Sustainable Fishing: Two Schools of Thought
Thu, Oct 22, 2009
Author: Kenji Lopez-Alt (41 Articles)
J. Kenji Lopez-Alt is a contributing editor for Cooks Illustrated Magazine, runs a private chef business, KA Cuisine, and writes a weekly column on burgers and food science for SeriousEats.com. He is also an occasional co-host of America's Test Kitchen . Kenji holds a BS from MIT and lives with his wife in Harlem.
- by Elizabeth Bomze
Liz Bomze is a Boston-based food writer and Associate Feature’s Editor at Cook’s Illustrated Magazine. She has written for numerous Boston publications including Boston Magazine, the Improper Bostonian, and the Boston Globe. Please welcome her!
Similar to CSAs (Community Supported Agriculture), where consumers pay farmers’ costs up-front in return for boxes of produce delivered throughout the season, Community Supported Fisheries (CSF) like the Cape Ann Fresh Catch (CAFC) program out of Gloucester, MA help people form a symbiotic relationship with the fishermen and the seas.

At the beginning of the fishing season, customers front the fishermen a season’s share worth of cash which guarantees that their daily catch will bring in a decent wage, regardless of its species. In exchange, the participants are rewarded with the freshest fish native to the New England shoreline for the rock-bottom price of about $3 per pound —compare that to the $13.99/pound charged for fresh cod at a Whole Foods. Fish is delivered weekly to various Boston-area pick-up locations, including Jamaica Plain, Cambridge, Ipswich, Lincoln, Acton, and a few North Shore towns.
Its inception came partially as a response to the problem of overfishing. Essentially, the issue is twofold: First, we’ve all heard plenty about how restaurant-chic species like Chilean seabass and common commodity catches like certain varieties of cod have been essentially blacklisted from sustainably conscious menus due to gross negligence of the ocean’s ecosystem. To meet consumer demand, fishermen are driven to catch a species faster than it can reproduce, thereby driving it towards extinction—and driving the fishermen who make a living off that catch out of business. Secondly, there’s the issue of bycatch. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that one in four animals caught in fishing gear dies as bycatch—unwanted or unintentional catch. Nets drag the bottom of the ocean from boats, capturing not only the specific species the fishermen are after, but also tons of unwanted animals—including dolphins, whales, and sea turtles—that the fishermen toss back into the water, dead or dying, because they have no market value, are too small to sell, or simply can’t fit on the boat, where cold storage space for the most lucrative species is at a premium.
The solution? Actually, there are two schools of thought revolving around what “sustainable fishing” really means, and two (somewhat overlapping) factors limiting what fishermen have been able to catch: “green” labeling , and price . First, the classic labeling system (which is still pretty young) like the one from the Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch program emerged as a result of both unhealthy fish farming (think salmon) and dramatic overfishing due to consumer demand. Twice a year, the program updates three categorized lists—“Best Choices (green), ” “Good Alternatives (yellow) ,” and “Avoid (red) ”—by adding and deleting various fish from each list as their projected sustainability changes. Proponents of the labeling program advocate fishing for very specific species (i.e. Pacific cod, not Atlantic cod) that are in abundance and harvested via environmentally friendly methods like catching shrimp via traps, which, according to Seafood Watch, allows fishermen to release 98 percent of unwanted fish alive. (Trap-caught shrimp make the “Best Choices” list.)
However, this system still has its critics. As a result of the labeling, fishermen are limited to catching only those species that will bring in top dollar—and throwing back everything else. It’s a “single-species marketing approach” that Niaz Dorry, Director of the Northwest Atlantic Marine Alliance (NAMA) and spokeswoman for CAFC, blames for disrupting the ocean’s ecosystem. “These [green-labeled] fish are now being overfished because the fishermen are driven to fish for them.” She cites a specific example from NAMA: Atlantic herring.
“In the late 90s, herring was green-lighted by some seafood standards because herring populations were considered robust by today’s fisheries management policies…But Atlantic herring is a critical part of the diet of many recovering marine animals living in the waters off of New England… Many of its predators’ populations have drastically declined due to a variety of environmental stresses—including overfishing. Unfortunately, fisheries managers seem to look at the ocean as a body of water full of single species of fish we like to eat rather than an ecosystem. But… the relationship between the predator and the prey—such as that between herring and its many predators such as cod or whales or seabirds or bluefin tuna—need to be accounted for properly when management decisions are made.”
And that’s where the newer system proposed by the CSF model comes in. Fishermen participating in CAFC are assured upfront that they will get the same price for hake and redfish that they do for cod . “If all the fish has equal value to the CSF shareholders, the fishermen don’t have to seek out just the big-ticket fish,” Dorry explains. Sustainably speaking, this is good news in several ways. Catching—and keeping—the full cross-section of what’s native to the area, eliminates bycatch. It’s a matter of “throwing back what you don’t need ”—a common practice for commercial boats—versus “fishing only for what you do need. ” Additionally, rather than spending days at sea in search of specific, high-demand species, the majority of CSF boats function as dayboats, staying closer to shore, reducing their carbon footprint, and guaranteeing fish that’s in some cases days fresher —and much cheaper —than what is commonly available on the market.
What’s more, Dorry says, sustainability is a matter of scale. (No pun intended.) Example: Commercial vessels can average 1 million pounds per catch versus 5,000 pounds for local dayboats. If those commercial boats are seeking out green-labeled Atlantic herring or mackerel, she explains, they’re disregarding how that affects other marine life—in this case, basically scooping up the primary food source for recently recovering species like cod and stripers.
The oceans aren’t the only ones who benefit from the system. Ignazio (Naz) Sanfilippo, a North Shore native and veteran of the fishing industry for 40 years, mans one of the six participating boats from Gloucester harbor and applauds the efforts of Dorry and CAFC. “This has been a big help to us [fishermen] and consumers because it cuts out the middleman. Otherwise, [the fish] goes through three or four hands, and everybody puts a tax on it. Here, the boat comes to the consumer.”
The Local Approach
So, what’s the catch to the CSF? None , according to Dorry, who says that programs like this one and the Port Clyde Fresh Catch in Maine are changing the way both consumers and fisherman think about the seafood industry. “Discussions about local food don’t often include seafood,” she said. That’s why she, the Gloucester Fishermen’s Wives Association, and others in the Gloucester area—a fishing community for over 400 years—decided to approach the local fishermen last year about instituting a new approach to their harvest. For the pilot project they recruited six of the 20 Gloucester dayboats, which typically set out in the wee hours of the morning and are back at the dock by dawn, their nets filled with cod, haddock, whiting, flounder, hake, dabs, pollack, redfish, and grey sole.
If there are foreseeable challenges with the CSF model, one might be that there’s no choice in what shows up in your weekly share. Particularly adventurous palates or those who really know their fish might find this exhilarating and the perfect opportunity to enjoy variety and learn how to cook new species. Others could find the process daunting—especially since most of the fish comes dressed (cleaned and gutted, but not filleted). Everyone will want a sharp knife on hand, and rookies who missed the first CAFC pickup, where fishermen offered quick demos on filleting, can take a look at a filleting video that NAMA posted on its website.
What’s more, the CSF model works well for the small percentage of the population living in coastal areas with active fisheries—but it’s not a universal solution to a global problem, and one could argue that (at least at the moment) the tagging system better addresses the problem on a larger scale.
Dorry notes that the success of this project depends on shareholders being open-minded about what fish they’re getting and patient so that this grassroots experiment can evolve. So far, so good. The response has been tremendous: Seven hundred and sixty-six people signed up for the first season. “That’s about 700 more people than I thought,” Dorry said, noting that there’s a waitlist of 700 more. “People have been excited to get new stuff like whiting,” a very firm, relatively small species that’s best cooked whole. Two more boats signed on for the second season, bringing the total to eight—a number Dorry and participating fishermen hope will increase in the coming months. Plans are also underway for a possible shrimp CSF this winter; check the NAMA website for updates.
Those interested in signing up can download a contract to print, sign, and mail in with your payment. Participants can sign up for either a full ($360) or half ($180) share for 12 weeks; that’s a weekly lot of 8-12 pounds or 4-6 pounds unfilleted fish (3-4 pounds and 1-2 pounds after filleting), respectively. As with a traditional CSA, the fish will be delivered each week to one of several designated locations listed on the NAMA website; updates about delivery times and changes will also be posted there regularly. And speaking of the website, it’s become quite the forum for members to blog about their CSF experiences, ask questions (which Dorry reliably answers) and share recipes like smoked Pollack and fish tacos. Yum.-
Tags: Kenji Lopez-Alt

Thanks for the great article on CSFs. I’ve posted a link to it on my blog at http://thefoodyoueat.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/community-supported-fisheries/
thank you for the great article .
it seems to be very useful.
I really like your blog and i respect your work. I’ll be a frequent visitor.
Thanks fishing and John!
Nice post
Kenji: as usual you tackle the issues of the day with great skill and sensitivity. This is a topic I’d like to see more opening discussed. Many only focus on the upside. I have heard that people in one CSF are only getting cod, cod, cod. What is being done to relieve pressure on this recovering but still unhealthy stock? When will fishermen set some accountability measures for reducing by catch or using more environmentally friending equipment? Many are still damaging the ocean habitat fishing for groundfish, as far as I’ve been able to discover, no one is talking about dates or accountability. I’d love to hear the associations say “by the year xx we will employ eco friendly equipment.” Or something along those lines. I’ve not had one person respond to my requests for this sort of transparency. I keep getting a “trust us” sort of answer. Well, that has landed us in the place we are now, depleted fishery with no economic and little environmental sustainability.
Maybe you can push a little further and see if someone can answer these questions? Okay, back to cleaning the oven and baking those pies!
Thanks again,
Jacqueline
@Jackie et. al
I must apologize profusely to Liz Bomze, who is the author of this post. For some reason when we migrated our site hosting, the bylines of all our past stories got lost – I’ve fixed that and added it back in.
I’ll inform her of your comments – I do remember discussing a couple of these issues with Liz while she was working on the piece, and I’m sure that she has some answers for you.
Kenji
we have create the same system In Lorient, France, since June. We began with 20 family and one boat (a trawler) and now we have more than forty families and two boats.
Hi Liz,
Great write up on CSFs. I run a cooking school (fish being one of my specialties), and everyone expected me to jump on the band wagon of CSFs. Unfortunately, I haven’t for many reasons. Some of them are environmental cans of worms I don’t want to get into right now. But mainly, it’s the boringness of fish from culinary perspective. All the fish they are offering are essentially lean, flaky, white fish. Eating it sometimes is nice, but eating it 3-4 times a week is boring. Why not catch much more flavorful bluefish or stripers for a change? It’s like a farm share of only kale, collard greens, and swiss chard.
The whole idea of “this is a fresh as it gets” doesn’t do anything for me. I shop at New Deal and Captain Marden’s and it’s as fresh as it gets too.
Also, comparing $3/Lb to $13 is a bit misleading. The fish you are getting is whole, so at least half of that is bones, heads, etc. The way inexperienced home cooks will fillet it, probably even more than half. It’s still a lot cheaper than buying it at the store, but cost is not the main deciding factor to the kinds of people who subscribe to CSFs. Most of the people I talked to who have tried it agree that they would gladly pay more to get fish already filleted.
Any thoughts? Have you tried a share yourself? How was it? It just strikes me that everyone is making a big deal about it because it’s a cool, fun, new thing. But I haven’t seen anyone talk about the issue from the culinary rather than environmental perspective.
Cheers,
-Helen
Thanks for the great article does are really big fish, thanks for sharing this information with us.
WooW! well really love the way you have written! I have few doubts that I want to ask you personally. please let me know how I can?
By the way a great find by me haha!
Regards
Adi
Sports blog
Woow! Well that’s an amazing info till date I found on internet!. You have written in a superb way buddy!
Keep it up! Keep up the good work. I would like to read more from you!
Regards
Adi
sports Blog
Clearly the solution is to change the snobbery around farmed fish. The “health issues” related to this source of protein for the world are not going be solved by a bunch of fools thinking they can tell the difference between farmed salmon and wild, when the real difference is between pinks/coho/sockeye and Atlantic.
I am not connected to any fisheries, except an occasional trout in the summer, and what is available at the grocer.
If there are real problems in farming fish, the most productive use of resources would be to collaborate with fish farmers to solve the issues, and create “green” fish from aquaculture.
Where am I wrong on this?
@Marcus
From an environmental aspect fish farming poses several problems. One that is usually present in non-organic farmed fish or shellfish is the frequent use of antibiotics in order to prevent disease outbreaks in tight packed colonies. The second problem also could be tackled through better planning and arises out of the high volume of feces produced by fish farms.
However the biggest issue is more one of fish stock management. Probably the fish that is farmed for commercial purposes the most is Salmon. Now what does a Salmon eat? Other fish! That means while Salmon farming might alleviate the fishing pressure on wild Salmon stocks, it increases drastically the pressure on the relevant prey fish – thus in turn hurting both wild Salmon populations as well as prey fish populations.
Unfortunately once a fish stock has been overfished (and nearly all of them have), sustainable management is not possible in any way. The only solution can be to drastically reducing fishing to let the stock rebuild. Then you can implement sustainable management principles (which incidentally will lead to a higher yield for lesser cost in the long run)
nice catch!
In a practical thinking about this, it doesn’t seem that CSF has any real chance to change the fishing industry in America. Its too local, too esoteric, and doesn’t cater to tastes. Most people just aren’t going to sign up.
The fact that fisherman realize they should get fish from responsible fisheries is the first step to change. The bi-catch problem is an inevitable problem, but one faced on almost all commercial fishing boats anyways.
Yes, in reality Community Supported Fisheries will not change the fishing industry in America, however, this progressive approach towards providing consumers with transparent well-documented seafood will encourage some dialogue. In addition, this mystery basket approach will get people to learn more about seafood from both a culinary and scientific perspective. They will spend more time in the kitchen learning how to filet a fish and probably enjoy some lesser known species of fish. In doing this many consumers will recognize how versatile and in many cases, simple, it is to cook and consume little-known species of seafood. Therefore the next time they are at the market they might try that piece of Arctic Char, or Mackerel, Sardines….instead of buying salmon or shrimp.
Doesn’t hurt to try.
I read Roz Cummins’ piece in Edible Boston on the CAFC and I remain disappointed to see the nebulous, vague promises that some day the fishermen will use more sustainable, less environmentally damaging methods. They also keep floating the spectre of industrial fishing “if you don’t support us then that’s what will happen.” That’s way too simplistic and does not obviate the need for transparency. “Trust us” is the model that got us to overfished cod in the first place!
I read Roz Cummins’ piece in Edible Boston on the CAFC and I remain disappointed to see the nebulous
Wow! Can’t believve the size of those fish… How the heck can I catch something like that – and WHERE ??
If you are willing to buy a car, you will have to get the personal loans. Moreover, my brother commonly takes a car loan, which occurs to be the most useful.
I have read a lot of the comments and I just wonder why people say the things they do, I mean they can find the bad in anything. I guess that is where we are in this world. Just hurt hurt hurt, no matter what the subject is. Lawrence Williams http://www.trybw.com Fort Myers, Naples, Bonita,Cape Coral Computer Repair Service
Bardzo dobry post ! Duzo się nuczyć można . Rewelacja !!